Author |
Message |
declinator
|
Post Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 6:05 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:03 am Posts: 56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
garyfritz
|
Post Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:28 am |
|
|
Offline |
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:47 am Posts: 1859
|
12/28/15 -- "happiness" in panel 3, "happyness" in panel 4
|
|
|
|
|
Zillatain
|
Post Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 1:21 am |
|
Admin of Slight Inconvenience |
|
Offline |
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:07 pm Posts: 6070
Location: Someplace other than where I am.
|
|
|
|
|
OrzBrain
|
Post Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2016 1:22 am |
|
|
Offline |
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 12:00 am Posts: 941
|
|
|
|
|
PtM
|
Post Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:47 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:13 am Posts: 17
|
January 22, last panel: "Did you just try and kill me".
|
|
|
|
|
Spirantz
|
Post Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:09 pm |
|
|
Offline |
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:44 am Posts: 2217
|
PtM wrote: January 22, last panel: "Did you just try and kill me". In strictest grammatical sense, "and" should be "to" as it is used as an infinitive, yes. If this were formal writing. ...But it's also very common these days for people to use "and" as an infinitive in daily speech. It's just how language is changing these days. So I wouldn't say this is an error in a comic, if that's how people are using it :) Thus sayeth the linguistic hippie!
|
|
|
|
|
garyfritz
|
Post Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:10 am |
|
|
Offline |
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 11:47 am Posts: 1859
|
|
|
|
|
LobosSolos
|
Post Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:15 am |
|
|
Offline |
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:07 am Posts: 1505
WLM: [email protected]
Yahoo Messenger: [email protected]
Location: Out of my mind, back... never
|
garyfritz wrote: http://www.sluggy.com/comics/archives/daily/160208 -- Doom Master (tm)'s last panel:
"you re doom" => "your doom"
I assume you intentionally replaced apostrophes with spaces? "There s", "Don t", "I ll" Or is this an intentional jab at the comics industry?
|
|
|
|
|
Azzy
|
Post Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:01 am |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:51 pm Posts: 67
|
|
|
|
|
rowsdower
|
Post Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:17 am |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 6:51 pm Posts: 32
|
160224: "We're you bit?" -> "Were you bit?"
|
|
|
|
|
PtM
|
Post Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 5:20 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:13 am Posts: 17
|
160229, second panel, "disorderor".
|
|
|
|
|
declinator
|
Post Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:52 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:03 am Posts: 56
|
|
|
|
|
zhecht
|
Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 1:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:38 pm Posts: 78
|
|
|
|
|
Duke Leto
|
Post Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:10 pm |
|
|
Offline |
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 12:00 am Posts: 1424
WLM: [email protected]
Location: Philadelphia
|
2016/3/18Either the other times he's identified himself as Lord Menelaus are inaccurate, or Lord Melenaus is a typo. I might be disproportionately annoyed at this because the original Menelaus was one of the original Atreides.
|
|
|
|
|
declinator
|
Post Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:24 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:03 am Posts: 56
|
Duke Leto wrote: 2016/3/18Either the other times he's identified himself as Lord Menelaus are inaccurate, or Lord Melenaus is a typo. One of the Melenaus is now fixed, but the second one (line 2, panel 1) remains. Now poor Urja cannot even decide.
|
|
|
|
|
|