by relax » Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:07 am
OK, who's the funny dude who changed my home page away from sluggy?
And for that matter, who else deleted my sluggy bookmark?
Then I remembered it was saturday - this happened before over Tryka-big-eyes. I was in fear Ian touched the sluggy prime universe and actually delayed reading sluggy to 6am - when I waked up from the flu and forgot it was saturday. The strip did nothing for my flu, I can tell you that!
It took me a while for rembering 'sluggy' takes two 'g' so I could find the site! Then *I* undid the homepage to sluggy myself (but kept a bookmark). There are things that shouldn't be surfed accidentally - got my little sister to cry all over the loss of Deplora's character depth!
Without sis I thought we were a poing short - she's not rating this. But it was three actually as gramps said he won't be a sluggite (give him a break, he only got to read from the last Ian to today's Ian) and Mom insisted we don't stay up late to read sluggy as a family and she bailed out! Sluggy is now read while she's asleep.
Well, the final rating was 2 kiki behind the couch and 0.1 poings out of a possible 4.
1 kiki poops for the "demons act just like humans with some words replaced or switched" stereotype. Won't this thing DIE already?? It had been done to death long before I was born in more comics that I can remember! And it's still a high school journal cartoon joke like it was the first time!
.5 kiki poops for Jerry Springer. We didn't knew who he was until we read about it in reactions - we're NOT watching that kind of show as it seem we're one "baser instinct" short of some other families. It was to us too obscure and dated of a reference, too badly done, too stereotypical, and "Jerry Stinger" has actually been done in the last Ian strip so it was bad then and it's worse now!
.5 kiki poops for null depth and "joke deficit disorder". Did you have your humor surgically removed when you were little or something??
The 0.1 poing is me, granted for effort rather than actual strip quality. This keeps you from the absolute zero which would be "OFF WITH IAN'S HEAD" where the caps are well deserved!
The effort I see is Ian's improvement on drawings. It used to be "tick off some readers greatly with exageration and occasionally confuse them with misplaced expressions" now it's "indifferent-bored at amateurish drawing" feel. We're not feeling emotionally connected to any character at all in it. On a good day, even your stickmen don't measure up to Pete's sticks for expressing emotions. Perhaps you should get some training if better imitating Pete's style is beyond your ability.
I still think you ought to go back and correct the Tryka-big eyes I mentionned last time (the "5 bucks on plorb" one - oh boy does that line brings back memory of the annoying confusion over Tryka!). In the words of Grandma who has seen only that strip: "why are her eyes big like that?". Exageration is one thing, but misplaced expressions are actually a nuisance to the comprehension of the strip - some people acquire a strong and persistent emotional anti-big-eyes bias as a result (I've seen it happen more than once and frankly it makes simple exageration elsewhere give negative gut-reactions that I and others would not otherwise get - even in non-sluggy comics).
P.S.: we're now out of the "becoming a defender of the nifty" thing due to the people with money dropping out. Perhaps I'll buy a T-shirt later when one I like comes out.